By Lea Ramos | Programs Director
Camila rented a unit in Ruby’s two-flat - it was the first time she was renting an apartment on her own, and she was excited about the opportunity to build independence and stability for herself. Ruby, who owned three rental units, had built her business over more than 20 years as a single mother and took great pride in being a fair and dependable landlord. When she met Camila, she shared how important trust and consistent communication were to her, especially when it came to paying rent on time. Camila described multiple income streams, personal savings, and a strong nearby support network of family and friends. Her preparation, confidence, and reliability gave Ruby confidence in renting to her, and for several months Camila consistently paid rent on time.
When unexpected challenges arose—including a job loss, mounting bills from a car accident, and transportation issues that affected her ability to earn income—Camila remained proactive. She communicated openly with Ruby about her circumstances, requested partial payment arrangements rather than avoiding the issue, applied for rental assistance, and actively searched for new employment. Even during a period of significant instability, she continued looking for ways to meet her obligations and stabilize her finances.
Ruby also demonstrated flexibility and patience throughout the process. Rather than immediately pursuing legal action, she listened to Camila’s concerns, accepted partial payments, and gave additional time in hopes that the situation would improve. She remained communicative and approachable, and despite growing financial pressure related to the property mortgage, she continued trying to work collaboratively with Camila for several months before filing a court case.
Throughout the mediation session, both parties showed a strong ability to remain respectful and engaged despite the stress surrounding the situation. They listened carefully to one another’s perspectives and were willing to openly discuss not only their positions, but also the underlying concerns driving them. Ruby was able to express her need for financial stability and predictability regarding the property, while Camila articulated her need for time to rebuild financially and secure stable housing. Their willingness to participate honestly in difficult conversations created space for productive dialogue.
Both parties also demonstrated flexibility and problem-solving skills during the mediation process. While their initial proposals were far apart, they remained committed to exploring possible solutions rather than escalating conflict. Camila considered options that involved moving out sooner in exchange for financial accommodations, while Ruby explored ways to structure accountability through payment timelines and court compliance dates. Even when tensions increased near the end of the session, both parties continued participating thoughtfully rather than shutting down communication.
A major strength of the mediation was the parties’ ability to continue working collaboratively even after the formal session ended. Instead of forcing an unrealistic agreement in the moment, the mediator helped them recognize the progress they had already made and encouraged them to continue negotiating independently. The parties demonstrated confidence, persistence, and growing trust in their ability to navigate the situation together.
By the time of the next court date, Ruby and Camila had successfully transformed the understanding developed during mediation into a practical agreement. Together, they created a move-out timeline that balanced Ruby’s need for certainty with Camila’s need for stability and time to secure new housing. They also developed a payment plan that felt achievable and sustainable. Their ability to continue communicating, negotiate details outside of mediation, and collaboratively manage complicated court processes reflected resilience, adaptability, and a shared commitment to finding a workable path forward.
Ultimately, the success of the mediation came from the strengths the parties brought into the process: openness, patience, accountability, communication, and a willingness to continue engaging with one another even during a highly stressful conflict. With support from the mediator, they were able to use those strengths to create a customized and mutually beneficial resolution.
Project reports on GlobalGiving are posted directly to globalgiving.org by Project Leaders as they are completed, generally every 3-4 months. To protect the integrity of these documents, GlobalGiving does not alter them; therefore you may find some language or formatting issues.
If you donate to this project or have donated to this project, you can receive an email when this project posts a report. You can also subscribe for reports without donating.
Support this important cause by creating a personalized fundraising page.
Start a Fundraiser