WaterWatch of Oregon

Since 1985, WaterWatch has pursued a single clear mission: To protect and restore flows in Oregon rivers to sustain the native fish, wildlife, and the people who depend on healthy rivers.
Aug 26, 2011

Legislative Attacks Successfully Defended

The Oregon Legislature is winding to a June finish
The Oregon Legislature is winding to a June finish

The 2011 Oregon Legislature:  River Protections Survive Multiple Attacks. 

Despite an evenly divided House and a long slate of bills that attempted to eliminate or undermine longstanding river protection laws, we can happily report that not a single bad water bill was signed into law in the 2011 Legislative session. During the 2011 session, WaterWatch was again on the front lines and addressed over 30 water bills. We successfully killed several bad bills in committee. Of the few water and river bills that moved through the House and Senate to the Governor’s desk, WaterWatch and its allies successfully negotiated protections to prevent erosion of existing standards or damage to Oregon’s beloved rivers. 

A sampling of the legislative concepts WaterWatch addressed in 2011 includes:

Hydropower and water---reducing environmental protections. The 2011 session produced several bills aimed at rolling back existing environmental protections in the name of new power and profits for special interests. For instance, HB 2873 sought to prohibit the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife from requiring fish passage, fish screening or fish bypass devices when an in-conduit hydro project is developed on an existing irrigation canal or diversion dam – some of which lack fish passage, fish screening or bypass devices entirely or otherwise fail to that comply with state law in these areas. In conduit hydro projects already receive multiple tax credits and other preferences. This bill would have added to the list of special interest giveaways on these projects. While the bill died in the senate, we anticipate seeing this legislative concept again soon. 

Other bills in this area included HB 2992, which attempted to remove all environmental protections and incentives regarding use of hydropower to meet Oregon’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS); HB 2864, which would have allowed old, environmentally damaging hydropower dams to qualify as “renewable”: and HB 2603 would have declared it that it is Oregon’s state policy to “encourage, enable and foster” development of “all types of power”, with no balancing policy statement regarding the importance of sustainability, environmental protection, renewable sources or energy conservation.  None of these flawed bills passed through the Legislature.

Weakening Columbia River protections: Like clockwork, every session irrigation interests attempt to eviscerate longstanding Columbia River fish protection laws. This year was no exception. HB 3509 would have given away Columbia River water to underground storage projects during months that imperiled migrating fish need adequate streamflows. Similarly, SB 190 attempted to give away thirty million acre feet of Columbia River water in a manner contrary to existing fish protection laws. Both bills failed but continued the flawed political calculation by some irrigation interests that Oregonians are willing to throw imperiled Columbia River fish under the bus to enrich a few well-connected irrigation interests in the Umatilla region.

The fail to plan and plan to fail bill: HB 3087 tried to eliminate further work on Oregon’s Integrated Water Resources Strategy. In 2009 WaterWatch was instrumental in passage of HB 3369, which, among other things, called for the development of an integrated plan to meet Oregon’s future instream and out-of-stream water needs. This bill would have stopped the ongoing planning effort.   

Stalling efforts to protect water for Willamette Basin fisheries: HB 3165 would have burdened and delayed, perhaps indefinitely, federal and state agency efforts to gain both access and legal protection for water released from Willamette Basin Project reservoirs for imperiled salmon.  Two federal agencies weighed in with concerns, which helped with the bill’s eventual demise. 

Undermining the state’s water management authority: The 2011 session also a number of special interest bills aimed at undercutting the state’s ability to manage water within irrigation districts (SB 847, SB 848, HB 3459) or govern permitting decisions in select areas (SB 589).  All of these died without much fanfare.

Deschutes Groundwater Mitigation: Governor Kitzhaber did sign HB 3623. This bill extends the Deschutes Groundwater Mitigation Program, a program that helps protect streamflows in the Deschutes River and its tributaries from the effects of new groundwater pumping in the basin.  After a number of amendments, agreement was reached to extend the program for 15 years. The Water Resources Department must report to the Legislature every five years on the overall effectiveness of the program and other specific areas. In the end, the bill preserves the existing program, but also leaves room for improvement outside of the legislative arena. This will continue to be of high priority to WaterWatch.  WaterWatch’s action alerts on this bill generated a huge response that helped dramatically improve the legislation. Thank you WW members!

Budget Issues: WaterWatch also joined a wide variety of stakeholders in pushing for support of the Water Resources Department budget.  These efforts paid off. The Governor’s proposed budget for the agency passed and a number of key water management and science positions were restored as budget “add backs”. Adequate funding of the Water Resources Department is critical to the long-term protection of Oregon’s rivers

For more information please contact: Jim Myron, WaterWatch lobbyist, myrons@canby.com or Kimberley Priestley, kjp@waterwatch.org.


Aug 26, 2011

Final Report - Project Successful!

WaterWatch is pleased to announce that this project was recently successfully completed!

On August 12th, the Oregon Water Resources Department signed and entered final orders approving multiple instream water right transfers on the Little Applegate River in the Rogue River Basin. WaterWatch was critical to moving these transactions to completion.

Now 5.4 cfs of flow is protected to the mouth of the Little Applegate River. More than half of this water has the oldest priority date on the Little Applegate. The water will provide and reestablish connectivity between the Little Applegate and the Applegate allowing Rogue Basin salmon and steelhead to reach and use prime habitat on the Little Applegate even in times of extreme drought. Thank you very much to the generous donors who contributed to this project through Global Giving. Seventeen donors contributed over $5,000 to help bring this project to a successful conclusion.  Also, thank you very much to the Kenney Brothers Foundation and the Brainerd Foundation for supporting this project in its initial stages.


Jun 14, 2011

Final Approval for the Little Applegate River Water Transfers Granted

On May 26, 2011 OWRD made a preliminary determination approving the instream transfers.  That means everything is done pending a notice period.  The transfers will become final on July 27, 2011 unless someone protests, which
is highly unlikely. We have likely incurred the last of the expenses we have for this project by paying for the publication of the notice.

We can safely say the following:  

1.   The transfer of 5.4 cfs of water by 14 landowners to an instream water right in the Little Applegate River was approved by the Oregon Water Resources Department on May 26, 2011.

2.   Pending a waiting period the transfers will become final on July 27, 2011.

3.   When final, this will permanently protect 5.4 cfs of flow to the mouth of the river, providing benefits to salmon and water quality.

We are very very close to finalizing this project!  Thank you for your on-going support!


An anonymous donor will match all new monthly recurring donations, but only if 75% of donors upgrade to a recurring donation today.
Terms and conditions apply.
Make a monthly recurring donation on your credit card. You can cancel at any time.
Make a donation in honor or memory of:
What kind of card would you like to send?
How much would you like to donate?
gift Make this donation a gift, in honor of, or in memory of someone?

Reviews of WaterWatch of Oregon

Great Nonprofits
Read and write reviews about WaterWatch of Oregon on GreatNonProfits.org.