Protect and Restore Free Flowing Oregon Rivers

by WaterWatch of Oregon
Draining Oregon
Draining Oregon

"Oregon is helping farmers drain the state's undergound reservoirs to grow cash crops in the desert, throwing sensitive ecosystems out of balance and fueling an agricultural boom that cannot be sustained..."

So begins "Draining Oregon," The Oregonian's landmark special report exposing the state's often maddeningly shortsighted management of our crucial groundwater supplies and the widespread problems created by Oregon's outdated, spottily applied, or underfunded groundwater protections. The series of stories highlights WaterWatch's work to reign in unsustainable groundwater development in the Malheur Lakes Basin.

It's extremely rare that these important groundwater issues receive this level of journalistic scrutiny and analysis. This series has drawn intense public attention, and for those who care about Oregon's rivers, lakes and streams -- and their own wellwater -- it presents a once-in-a-decade opportunity to demand concrete action. Thanks to your support, WaterWatch will be working hard to seize this chance to protect Oregon's threatened groundwater supplies -- along with the waterways, fish, wildlife, and people dependent on healthy aquifers! Below are some key solutions we are proposing:

Stop Digging the Hole Deeper.

Oregon's groundwater may be in crisis, but you wouldn't know it from the speed at which regulators say "yes" to new groundwater pumping applications. Instead of defaulting to "yes" when the sate isn't certain that there is enough groundwater to support the new pumping, regulators should default to "no" when the information on groundwater in a specific area is absent or inadequate. At a minimum, the Department should stop issuing new permits unless they can determine additional pumping won't harm fish, wildlife, and other water users.

Take Stock of Additional Groundwater Resources.

In the past, the state has passed up matching federal funds to help pay for needed groundwater studies. We cannot afford to let this happen again. The Oregon Water Resources Department -- with the full backing of Governor Brown -- should ask legislators for increased funding on studies to rapidly improve our understanding of the current condition and future resiliency of our state's groundwater resources. The state should be required to have comprehensive studies completed for key watersheds by a set date.

Get Serious About Funding Groundwater Management.

There's no way around it -- protecting vast and incredibly valuable public resources such as groundwater costs money. Despite this, the state has always relied on a shoestring budgeting approach to goundwater management, with predictable results. In 2017, legistators should ask groundwater users to pay a nominal annual fee to help pay for the ongoing management and enforcement necessary to protect this vital public resource -- and prevent the kind of underfunding and neglect that results in lawful groundwater permit holders seeing their rights being drained away from under them.

To Manage Water, We Must Measure Water.

The state must require and fund actions to achieve measurement and reporting of all waters in the state, including pumping at existing wells. Again, having a better handle on water use will not only protect water supplies, waterways, and wildlife, it will also protect existing users, communities, and economic activity dependent upon reliable water supplies.

Zero Tolerance for Unlawful Groundwater Use.

The Oregonian series exposed the practice of water users digging new wells first, then asking the state for permission later. This practice has become common in some parts of Oregon because it's an open secret that regulators will reward such scofflaws with permits after the fact. This practice must end if we are to stop Oregon's growing groundwater crisis and secure our water supplies.


Willamette River
Willamette River

In a move that could endanger fish and river health, in May the City of Salem agreed to sell up to half of its water right on the Willamette River to Hillsboro for $16.2 million.

“What’s happening is encouraging speculation in water in the Willamette Valley and across the state,” admonishes John DeVoe, executive director of WaterWatch. “These entitlements should not be permitted.”

Currently, Salem is allowed to divert 200 cubic feet per second of surface area. With this agreement, Hillsboro will now be entitled to 56 cfs, with an additional first right of refusal for another 44 cfs.

Salem has been sitting on this water right since 1976, when it first applied for the right. At that time, the City assured the Oregon Water Resources Department that it would complete construction projects and use the water by 1984.

Salem still has not done this. But in 2015 WRD gave it an extension anyway, to 2086 – a date at which Salem’s original water right application will be 110 years old.

The City doesn’t even get its drinking water from the Willamette, but instead from the North Santiam River.

This has happened before. An agreement between Hillsboro and Adair Village led the state to extend a water right held by Adair Village to 2050. The agreement fell through, but Adair Village got to keep the extension.

DeVoe says: “Adair Village got the extension based on its representation that it would sell much of the water to Hillsboro. Lo and behold, that’s not what ended up happening. Now Adair Village is sitting on a large water right. It’s out marketing the water.”

WaterWatch is worried this recent transaction will lead to speculative development and further imperil fish and wildlife.

There is no charge for this transfer of a public resource. Once transferred, cities can – and do – “turn around and market the water and profit from it,” DeVoe remarks.

WaterWatch engages in litigation, education, and lobbying to prevent exactly this from happening. Support our ongoing efforts with a contribution today, and send a message that river health and that of fish and wildlife should not be jeopardized by a chance to profit.


Pristine waters of the North Fork Smith River
Pristine waters of the North Fork Smith River

In April, Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality took comments on whether to initiate a rulemaking process to protect the pristine and Wild and Scenic North Fork Smith River and all of its tributaries as “Outstanding Resource Waters” – a designation that would prevent any new pollution or degradation for one of our state’s cleanest and most beautiful waterways.

The Oregon Environmental Quality Commission, which oversees DEQ, then decided to direct the state agency tasked with protecting clean water to move forward with a rulemaking process to formally consider the ORW designations. This is progress!

The North Fork Smith River and its tributaries flow through Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest lands in remote southwest Oregon’s Curry County. The watershed includes the Kalmiopsis Wilderness and the North Fork Smith River Wild and Scenic River corridor, as well as the South Kalmiopsis, Packsaddle, and Baldface Creek Roadless Areas.

In Oregon, 88% of the North Fork Smith River watershed is either a “Wilderness” or “Roadless Area” classification, but roughly 30,000 acres remain open to mining.

And of course, there are challengers.

A proposal for an industrial nickel strip mine by a foreign-owned mining company is pending for the North Fork Smith watershed, so consideration of this ORW process is timely to ensure this beautiful natural area is protected.

The proposal is strongly opposed by local communities, businesses, and anglers. With the exceptional water quality and critical habitat of the North Fork watershed under threat, WaterWatch is actively working with a team of fellow conservationists to protect this precious resource.

The Wild and Scenic North Fork Smith River watershed is home to some of Oregon’s most extraordinarily high quality water as required for a designation. Two studies by the U.S. Forest Service found the North Fork Smith River to be “outstandingly remarkable” because of its exceptional water quality and pristine salmon habitat.

Other states have routinely protected their highest quality waters under the Clean Water Act as the Commission is considering. For example, California has designated two Outstanding National Resource Waters. Wisconsin has protected 254 streams, and New Mexico has protected 194 streams – all as ONRW. Oregon has never designated one.

Consistent with Oregon’s actions, California is also now considering Outstanding National Resource Water designations for the remainder of the Smith River watershed across the border from Oregon.

Support WaterWatch in our ongoing effort to protect and restore free flowing Oregon rivers, like the North Fork Smith River, by making a contribution today. By so doing, you will stand up to strip miners and send a message that our state’s natural beauty and resources are not for sale.

Rare plants found naturally by the river
Rare plants found naturally by the river
Beautiful North Fork Smith waters
Beautiful North Fork Smith waters
Dam site
Dam site

...we know the worth of water."
          - Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac

Thankfully, some wells will not go dry because you've helped do something great: In February, Oregon and California's elected leaders, along with the Obama Administration, prioritized an agreement to remove the four lower Klamath River dams!

Removal of these four obsolete hydro dams will be a major step forward for the health of the Klamath River and the communities of the Klamath Basin.

“These dams cause profound damage to salmon populations and water quality in the Klamath River,” said Jim McCarthy, WaterWatch’s Communications Director and Southern Oregon Program Manager. “Their removal will be a boon for the many communities which depend upon the Klamath River’s invaluable resources, help fulfill Native American fishing rights throughout the basin, and protect thousands of commercial and recreational salmon fishing jobs.”

Klamath dam removal had remained stalled for years by unnecessary linkage to federal legislation to implement the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, a wildly expensive and controversial water deal that had divided the basin’s Native American tribes, conservationists, and agricultural community. Congress then held dam removal hostage by failing to act on the agreement, which expired in 2015.

While this is a step in the right direction, WaterWatch continues to have serious concerns over water supply for Lower Klamath and Tule Lake national wildlife refuges. And several items remain on the to-do list -- advancing a stand-alone dam removal deal separate from any water agreement or other federal legislation; urging legislators to not propose any new electrical power subsidies for upper Klamath Basin irrigators; stopping repeated Klamath waterfowl die-offs due to water scarcity; and implementing basin-wide, comprehensive, and voluntary water use reduction in the region.

But for now, your generous support has helped set the stage to remove four more dams -- and that is a big deal! Thank you.

Stay tuned for more updates!

[Photos courtesy of Jim McCarthy.]

J.C. Boyle Dam
J.C. Boyle Dam
Keno Dam
Keno Dam


Dam Removal - Phase 1
Dam Removal - Phase 1

You did it! Thanks to your support, we removed two dams!

In summer 2015, WaterWatch removed Fielder and Wimer Dams from Evans Creek in the Rogue Basin. Our Free the Rogue campaign is now funded!

These two obsolete dams were ranked as the fourth and eighth worst fish passage barriers in Oregon. Removal will reconnect up to 70 miles of high-quality habitat in Evans Creek for Rogue Basin salmon and steelhead. Access is now reopened for native fish on a key spawning tributary of the Rogue River. Evans Creek is now entirely free-flowing at both sites and Rogue salmon and steelhead will regain improved access to some 70 miles of quality habitat in the upper reaches of the creek.

We couldn’t have done it without you! To give you an idea of what the dam removal looked like, peruse some of the photo clips below.

This is a huge victory for Oregon's rivers, but our work statewide is far from over. Contribute to our campaign to support Oregon's rivers, streams, and lakes for the fish, wildlife, and people that depend on them!

Dam Removal - Phase 2
Dam Removal - Phase 2
Dam Removal - Phase 3
Dam Removal - Phase 3



About Project Reports

Project Reports on GlobalGiving are posted directly to by Project Leaders as they are completed, generally every 3-4 months. To protect the integrity of these documents, GlobalGiving does not alter them; therefore you may find some language or formatting issues.

If you donate to this project or have donated to this project, you will get an e-mail when this project posts a report. You can also subscribe for reports via e-mail without donating.

Get Reports via Email

We'll only email you new reports and updates about this project.

Organization Information

WaterWatch of Oregon

Location: Portland, Oregon - USA
Website: http:/​/​
Project Leader:
John DeVoe
Portland, Oregon United States
$9,330 raised of $20,000 goal
38 donations
$10,670 to go
Donate Now Add Project to Favorites

Help raise money for this important cause by creating a personalized fundraising page for this project.

Start a Fundraiser

Learn more about GlobalGiving

Teenage Science Students
Vetting +
Due Diligence


Woman Holding a Gift Card
Gift Cards

Young Girl with a Bicycle

Sign up for the GlobalGiving Newsletter

WARNING: Javascript is currently disabled or is not available in your browser. GlobalGiving makes extensive use of Javascript and will not function properly with Javascript disabled. Please enable Javascript and refresh this page.